Skip navigation
FACT
Focus on Alternative and Complementary Therapies

Comparison of subcutaneous carbon dioxide insufflations, and sham-ultrasound for treating acute non-specific neck pain in general practice

Brockow T1, Heißner T2, Franke T1, Strauch I1, Kretzschmann K1, Resch KL1
1Spa Medicine Research Institute Bad Elster, Lindenstrasse 5, Bad Elster, D–08645, Germany
2General Practice T Heißner, Basteistrasse 73, Lohmen, D–01847, Germany

Objective

To compare the efficacy of subcutaneous carbon dioxide insufflations, and sham-ultrasound for treating patients with acute non-specific neck pain in general practice.

Materials and methods

A total of 126 consecutive patients (mean age: 45 ± 13.5 years) reporting non-specific neck pain < 7 days were randomised to subcutaneous carbon dioxide insufflations (experimental group) or 5 min sham-ultrasound (display of 0.2 W/cm2 but no delivery of sound waves). Both interventions were administered by two persons in a randomised order. Patients, therapists and investigator were masked to sham-treatment. Main outcome measure was duration of neck pain analysed by time to event analysis. Non-response, on-demand analgesics, and the McGill Pain Questionnaire were secondary outcome measures.

Results

Twenty-seven of 63 patients (43%) became pain-free during the 28-day observation period in the experimental group, and 29 of 63 (46%) in the control group. Mean pain duration was 23 days in the experimental group, and 22 days in the control group (P = 0.77; log rank test). Nine of 63 experimental persons (14%) discontinued treatment due to non-response, and 10 of 63 (16%) persons of the control group (P = 1.0; Fisher’s exact test). Other outcome measures also did not differ between groups.

Conclusion

Subcutaneous carbon dioxide insufflations are not better than sham-ultrasound for treating patients with acute non-specific neck pain. Non-specific effects might play an important role in the treatment of acute non-specific neck pain, though self-limitation cannot be excluded.

Top | Next: Development of a CAM curriculum in Canadian undergraduate medical schools»
© Pharmaceutical Press 2009
Accessibility | Terms and Conditions