Skip navigation
FACT
Focus on Alternative and Complementary Therapies

Improving the quality of reporting of RCTs evaluating herbal interventions: implementing the CONSORT statement

Gagnier JJ1, Boon H2, Rochon P3, Moher D4, Barnes J5, Bombardier C6
15955 Ontario St, Unit 307, Windsor, Ontario, N8S 1W6, Canada
2Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, 19 Russell Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5S2S2, Canada
3Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care, 3560 Bathurst Street, Toronto, Ontario, M6A 2E1, Canada
4Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, 401 Smyth Road, Rm. 139, Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L1, Canada
5Centre for Pharmacognosy & Phytotherapy, School of Pharmacy, University of London, 29/39 Brunswick Square, WC1N 1AX, UK, London
6Institute for Work and Health, 481 University Avenue, Suite 800, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2E9, Canada

Objective

Our objective was to develop suggestions for reporting RCTs of herbal medicine interventions.

Materials and methods

We identified and invited potential participants with expertise in clinical trial methodology, clinical trial reporting, pharmacognosy, herbal medicinal products, medical statistics and/or herbal product manufacturing to participate in a consensus development meeting. Three phases were conducted: (1) pre-meeting item generation, (2) consensus meeting and (3) post-meeting feedback. Sixteen individuals participated in pre-meeting telephone calls for item generation and fourteen participants attended a consensus meeting in Toronto, Ontario, Canada in June, 2004. During the consensus meeting a modified Delphi technique was used to aid the discussion and debate of the information required for reporting RCTs of herbal medicines.

Results

After extensive discussion the group decided that context-specific explanations of existing CONSORT items were necessary. This resulted in elaborating nine items to RCTs of herbal medicines: 1 (title and abstract), 2 (background), 3 (participants), 4 (interventions), 6 (outcomes), 15 (baseline data), 20 (interpretation), 21 (generalisability), 22 (overall evidence).

Conclusion

The elaboration of item 4 of the CONSORT statement outlines the specific information required for complete reporting of the herbal medicine intervention. The reporting suggestions presented will support clinical trialists, editors and reviewers in reporting and reviewing RCTs of herbal medicines, and readers in interpreting the results.

Acknowledgements

This study was funded in part by an operating grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Clinical Trials Divisions, grant number ATF-66679. Joel J Gagnier is supported by a post-graduate fellowship from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Natural Health Products Directorate.

Top | Next: Introducing a computer-assisted, digital tongue-imaging device to standardise and evaluate traditional Chinese tongue diagnosis»
© Pharmaceutical Press 2009
Accessibility | Terms and Conditions