Skip navigation
FACT
Focus on Alternative and Complementary Therapies

CAM in the treatment of low back pain: perception and use by people suffering low back pain

Quinn F1, Hughes C2, Baxter D3
1Health and Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Ulster, Northern Ireland, UK
2School of Health Sciences, University of Ulster, Shore Road, Newtownabbey, Northern Ireland, Co.Antrim BT37 OQB, UK
3School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

Objective

To ascertain the views and use of CAM among people with low back pain (LBP).

Materials and methods

A questionnaire investigating the views and use of CAM among LBP sufferers was distributed among two groups: staff at the University of Ulster and patients attending physiotherapy outpatient clinics.

Results

Two hundred and twenty-two people suffering LBP completed the questionnaire. The most common reason for LBP onset was ‘simple LBP’ (41.7%). Forty-six per cent of respondents stated that they had tried CAM for their LBP and the majority of those had found it effective (51% of respondents who stated they had tried CAM). Of the respondents who use CAM 46.3% found it more effective than conventional treatments, with 26.9% of CAM users finding it just as good. The most commonly cited CAM was acupuncture (21.6% of total sample), followed by reflexology (9.5%). Most respondents would consider using CAM to treat their LBP (90.1%); however, 45.5% were unsure which CAM to use.

Conclusion

LBP sufferers are willing to try CAM to relieve their LBP but many are unsure which therapies will be effective. More high quality research through RCTs is needed to establish the effectiveness of CAM for LBP, so that LBP patients can make more informed decisions regarding the management of their LBP.

Top | Next: CAM for painful diabetic neuropathy: a systematic review»
© Pharmaceutical Press 2009
Accessibility | Terms and Conditions